Dangers and ineffectiveness of Vaccines

Aug 29, 2009 in Scandals (40)

HISTORICAL FACTS EXPOSING THE DANGERS AND INEFFECTIVENESS OF VACCINES

- In 1871-2, England, with 98% of the population aged between 2 and 50 vaccinated against smallpox, it experienced its worst ever smallpox outbreak with 45,000 deaths. During the same period in Germany, with a vaccination rate of 96%, there were over 125,000 deaths from smallpox. (The Hadwen Documents)

- In Germany, compulsory mass vaccination against diphtheria commenced in 1940 and by 1945 diphtheria cases were up from 40,000 to 250,000. (Don’t Get Stuck, Hannah Allen)

- In the USA in 1960, two virologists discovered that both polio vaccines were contaminated with the SV 40 virus which causes cancer in animals as well as changes in human cell tissue cultures. Millions of children had been injected with these vaccines. (Med Jnl of Australia 17/3/1973 p555)

- In 1967, Ghana was declared measles free by the World Health Organisation after 96% of its population was vaccinated. In 1972, Ghana experienced one of its worst measles outbreaks with its highest ever mortality rate. (Dr H Albonico, MMR Vaccine Campaign in Switzerland, March 1990)

- In the UK between 1970 and 1990, over 200,000 cases of whooping cough occurred in fully vaccinated children. (Community Disease Surveillance Centre, UK)

- In the 1970’s a tuberculosis vaccine trial in India involving 260,000 people revealed that more cases of TB occurred in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. (The Lancet 12/1/80 p73)

- In 1977, Dr Jonas Salk who developed the first polio vaccine, testified along with other scientists, that mass inoculation against polio was the cause of most polio cases throughout the USA since 1961. (Science 4/4/77 “Abstracts” )

- In 1978, a survey of 30 States in the US revealed that more than half of the children who contracted measles had been adequately vaccinated. (The People’s Doctor, Dr R Mendelsohn)

- In 1979, Sweden abandoned the whooping cough vaccine due to its ineffectiveness. Out of 5,140 cases in 1978, it was found that 84% had been vaccinated three times! (BMJ 283:696-697, 1981)

-The February 1981 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association found that 90% of obstetricians and 66% of pediatricians refused to take the rubella vaccine.

- In the USA, the cost of a single DPT shot had risen from 11 cents in 1982 to $11.40 in 1987. The manufacturers of the vaccine were putting aside $8 per shot to cover legal costs and damages they were paying out to parents of brain damaged children and children who died after vaccination. (The Vine, Issue 7, January 1994, Nambour, Qld)

- In Oman between 1988 and 1989, a polio outbreak occurred amongst thousands of fully vaccinated children. The region with the highest attack rate had the highest vaccine coverage. The region with the lowest attack rate had the lowest vaccine coverage. (The Lancet, 21/9/91)

- In 1990, a UK survey involving 598 doctors revealed that over 50% of them refused to have the Hepatitis B vaccine despite belonging to the high risk group urged to be vaccinated. (British Med Jnl, 27/1/1990)

- In 1990, the Journal of the American Medical Association had an article on measles which stated ” Although more than 95% of school-aged children in the US are vaccinated against measles, large measles outbreaks continue to occur in schools and most cases in this setting occur among previously vaccinated children.” (JAMA, 21/11/90)

- In the USA, from July 1990 to November 1993, the US Food and Drug Administration counted a total of 54,072 adverse reactions following vaccination. The FDA admitted that this number represented only 10% of the real total, because most doctors were refusing to report vaccine injuries. In other words, adverse reactions for this period exceeded half a million! (National Vaccine Information Centre, March 2, 1994)

- In the New England Journal of Medicine July 1994 issue a study found that over 80% of children under 5 years of age who had contracted whooping cough had been fully vaccinated.

- On November 2nd, 2000, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) announced that its members voted at their 57th annual meeting in St Louis to pass a resolution calling for an end to mandatory childhood vaccines. The resolution passed without a single “no” vote. (Report by Michael Devitt)

“When men differ, both sides ought equally be heard by the public, for when truth and error have fair play, the former is always an overmatch for the latter”
Benjamin Franklin

GRAPHICAL EVIDENCE SHOWS VACCINES DIDN’T SAVE US

Broken Links ? Questions ?

TO CONTACT JMB CLICK ON THE STAMP

FDA Required Disclosure

jmbblog

A podcast powered by FeedBurner

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,

about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Leave your Comment

Consumers Duped by Trans Fat Labeling

Aug 29, 2009 in Scandals (40)

Consumers Duped by Trans Fat Labeling

FDA food labeling rules make it possible for consumers to exceed their maximum recommended daily intake of trans fats even if they eat only foods labeled “zero trans fats” per serving.

rans fats, also known as hydrogenated oils, are synthetically produced by adding hydrogen atoms to unsaturated vegetable oils. Unlike natural unsaturated or saturated fats, trans fats have no nutritional value. They have been overwhelmingly shown to increase the risk of death from cardiovascular disease, such that several large cities and the state of California have banned their use in restaurants.

The fats are favored by food producers because they have a longer shelf life than natural fats. But growing consumer awareness over the dangers of trans fats has led more and more people to avoid them. According to a recent survey by Greenfield Online, 72 percent of U.S. residents read nutritional labels to make food purchasing decisions, and 61 percent believe that “zero trans fats” is the most important claim for a heart-healthy food.

Yet because the FDA allows nutrient content to be rounded to the nearest half gram, all food producers need to do to make a “zero trans fats” claim is set the serving size low enough that it contains no more than 0.49 grams of trans fats.

According to Steve Hughes, chief executive officer of Smart Balance, even consumers looking out for trans fats on nutritional labels “could exceed the daily limit before they even sit down to dinner.”

The FDA recommends a maximum daily trans fat intake of two grams.

Consumers can still avoid trans fats by reading ingredient labels. Any food that contains “hydrogenated” or “partially hydrogenated” oils actually contains trans fats, regardless of what it might say on the label or in the nutritional information box.

“The good news is Americans are making healthier food choices a priority and they clearly recognize the dangers of trans fat,” said dietitian Alyse Levine. “But unfortunately reading the fine print is necessary to ensure they’re not getting more trans fat and putting their health at greater risk than they bargained for.”

By: David Gutierrez. Naturalnews

Sources for this story include: www.foodnavigator-usa.com.

Broken Links ? Questions ?

TO CONTACT JMB CLICK ON THE STAMP

FDA Required Disclosure

jmbblog

A podcast powered by FeedBurner

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,

about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Leave your Comment

Cancer Drug Reported to Cause Aggressive Cancer Tumors

Aug 29, 2009 in Cancer

Tamoxifen Reported to Cause Aggressive Cancer Tumors

he cancer prevention drug, tamoxifen, may cause cancer. It has been reported that rare cancers are being found in long-term users. Tamoxifen is the drug of choice, prescribed after breast cancer detection or surgery. Its use is deemed to have a 20% success rate in preventing further incidences of cancer. For this reason, many breast cancer survivors are long term users of tamoxifen, and this news is disturbing for both them and their caregivers.

Tamoxifen is an estrogen-blocking drug. The tumors that developed in the tamoxifen users were rare but aggressive. Some suggest that the risks still outweigh the downside, because tamoxifen is so successful at preventing a recurrence of common breast tumors.

Many question the report and its methodology, which is the typical reaction from the medical community to bad news. And this is especially bad news, as tamoxifen is a staple in the fight against cancer.

he report about tamoxifen was not based on a research study, but only on observation. However the observation was made at the esteemed Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, WA, a center long known for comprehensive scientific research and reporting. The report was published in Cancer Research. According the Dr. Li, the author of the report, long term tamoxifen usage increases risk by four-fold for a more aggressive, difficult-to-treat type of cancer in the breast opposite, or contralateral, to the initial tumor.

This report follows previously published findings by Dr. Li in 2001, in which the same findings were reported. At that time, Dr. Li found a fivefold increased risk of estrogen-receptor (ER)-negative breast cancers in breast cancer survivors taking tamoxifen. The 2001 study contained 9,000 women over the age of 50. They were followed from 1990 and 1999. All of the women lived in Western Washington State and this study was the first population-based study that looked at the estrogen-receptors in contralateral (opposite side of the body) breast tumors.

he use of tamoxifen has been shown to reduce by 20% the ER-positive contralateral breast cancers – the most common type. This type of cancer is found in two-thirds of the cases diagnosed. Now that findings show a 500% increase in of estrogen-receptor (ER)-negative breast cancers, breast cancer survivors and their caregivers should assess the risks versus benefits and perhaps seek alternative treatments.

New research in the area of homeopathy and botanical medicine shows promise for both cancer prevention and cancer relapse, without the side effects known to be triggered by tamoxifen and other drugs. It is hoped that research in these fields will fill the need for cancer prevention in coming years.

By: Melanie Grimes, Naturalnews

http://www.fhcrc.org/about/ne/news/…
http://www.fhcrc.org/about/ne/news/…
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/26/h…
http://www.NaturalNews.com/026872_P…

Broken Links ? Questions ?

TO CONTACT JMB CLICK ON THE STAMP

FDA Required Disclosure

jmbblog

A podcast powered by FeedBurner

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it,

about it, and subscribe to the blog RSS feed.

Leave your Comment

A conspiracy of silence about swine flu natural remedies

Aug 28, 2009 in Scandals (40), Swine Flu,H1N1

Setting the people up to die: A conspiracy of silence about swine flu natural remedies

t’s emblazoned across the front page of USA Today, just underneath a subhead declaring Michael Jackson was, indeed, killed by a drug overdose: “Flu could infect half of USA.” The article goes on to describe the predicted number of deaths expected in the U.S. (30,000 – 90,000 Americans) as well as the actions being taken by the government to protect Americans from the coming swine flu pandemic.

That advice reads sort of like a comic book of health care advice for kindergarteners: Wash your hands, cover your mouth if you cough and let “the grownups” take care of the rest by injecting you with a vaccine. Curiously absent from all the health advice being handed out on the swine flu by the White House, the CDC, the WHO and even the FDA is any mention of Vitamin D or other natural remedies that offer enormous protections from influenza infections.

he absence of this information from virtually all the advice being handed out to the American public is increasingly suspicious. If a pandemic flu is, indeed, threatening to infect half the U.S. population, and if most of the population is deficient in a nutrient known to strongly prevent influenza infections, wouldn’t it make good sense to make a few announcements encouraging Americans to raise their vitamin D levels throughout the coming winter?

It is a well-known medical fact, of course, that influenza always gets worse during the winter months North of the equator and the summer months South of the equator (which are really called their “winter” months). This is because as sunlight hours lessen during the winter, the people living there become vitamin D deficient and are susceptible to influenza infections of all kinds.