Forcing Sterilization ?/!

Here you will learn how they are sterilizing the population and why dicks extender is a growing business

The man who refused to be bribed. What herbicides are doing to animals, and to man’s sexual prowess.

Sex, Lies and Hormones

Mr Hayes was asked by a consulting firm named Ecorisk to look into one of the world’s most commonly used herbicides, Atrazine, which has been used since 1958. What he discovered was not really pleasing for the people of Ecorisk who work on behalf of Syngenta. Because Syngeta manufactures Atrazine.

Tyrone Hayes found that Atrazine in concentrations as low as one part per billion was inhibiting the growth of the larynxes of male frogs. Under EPA guidelines, Atrazine is considered safe in drinking water as long as it is found in levels no greater than three parts per billion. Which according to his results, was far higher than the safe amount. So he decided to advise his boss about the danger of Atrazine for the general population.

Ecorisk responded cautiously, suggesting that the findings required confirmation with additional research, but the company at this point made no move to provide funding for further research. Nevertheless, Tyrone Hayes decided to continue the research with his own funds and the help of his students.

In the year 2000 Tyrone found that the frogs were literally changing sex and the test subjects were producing eggs instead of sperm. The herbicide Atrazine triggers these changes by stimulating the activity of an enzyme called aromatase, which converts the male hormone testosterone into estradiol (an estrogen). So he reported his results to Syngenta. At first, the company tried to make him change his results. He refused, so instead they tried to bribe him with a job.

Ron Kendall, director of the Ecorisk panel, offered him $2 million to do the studies “in a private setting”. Hayes understood that this meant in a setting where Ecorisk and Syngenta could control the release of the data. Two million dollars is a lot of money specially if you consider that a researcher is not very well paid, far less money than a MD, for example.

At this point Hayes began to realize just how deep scientific conflicts of interest can go, especially when huge profits are at stake.

“Ron Kendall was working both for Syngenta and running Ecorisk while also chairing a scientific advisory panel to the EPA.” Obviously this resulted in some bias in his work for the EPA. A busy man obviously, but let’s read together what Tyrone Hayes has to say in his own words:

An Interview with Tyrone Hayes

“After I published my initial data I had people from the Worldwide Fund for Nature (WWF) advising me that I should never go home the same way twice… When I testified for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), I had to have a federal officer pick me up and take me to my hotel. I was advised to stay in a different hotel each night and call him and let him know where I was each day.”

Atrazine’s toxic effects are not limited to frogs. It has been shown to feminize fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals.

Herbicides or Spermicides?

Human data shows that levels of Atrazine in the urine of men who live and work in some agricultural areas and who are experiencing fertility problems, are equivalent to the levels used to chemically castrate frogs.

In 2004 epidemiologists from the University of Missouri found reproductive consequences in humans associated with Atrazine, including sperm counts in men in farm communities that are 50% below normal. Iowa scientists are finding similar results in a current study.

The EPA’s response:

For the foreign reader who does not know about the EPA, these three letters stand for Environment Protection Agency. The EPA acknowledged that the Ecorisk studies presented to it were flawed and biased, it nonetheless re-approved Atrazine for use in the US in 2003.

So the EPA called for more studies but guess who’s going to do those studies?

Syngenta

(*) From an interview of Tyrone Hayes by the Ecologist online Author: Pat Thomas

What you should know but nobody dares to tell you:

The EPA has never acted to ban a dangerous substance that it had previously approved.